<>*****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************<>

Elias Kapetanopoulos

Professor Dr. (Greece-Rome)

Department of History

Central Connecticut State University

New Britain, CT 06050-4010 (USA)

Telephone:

(860) 832-2820 (Office)

(860) 832-2804 (Fax)

(860) 229-9960 (Home)

E-mail: Kapetanopoulos@ccsu.edu

Web site: www.history.ccsu.edu/elias/elias.htm

Areas of Research: Attic epigraphy and Athenian institutions of the Roman period, 200 B.C.-A.D. 300, and early Makedon(ia): Makedones as Hellenes.

==========================================

PUBLICATIONS

ARTICLES:

1. The Romanization of the Greek East: The Evidence of Athens, BASP 2 (1965) 45-55

(Colloquium: The Romanization of the Greek East - American Historical Association, 29 Dec. 1964, Washington, D.C.). Corrigenda appended to offprints.

Addenda-Corrigenda:

P. 47, 29: allegoricaly = allegorical

P. 48, 7: in the west = in Greece proper

24: to = two

38: .. as how…would be made = .. as to how…should be made

P. 49, 16: lecture = lectures (with Sextus the Boeotian)

36: offspring = offspring Roman names

P. 50, 7: some must have visited the city = some have visited the city, as

attested from literary sources (cf. Plutarch, Cato the Elder, XII, 4; and Polyb., XVI, 25, 2-6; and 27, 1). For Athens and the Romans at this early period, see G. Hinstin, Les Romains à Athènes avant l’Empire, Paris, 1877, pp. 45sqq.

12: … 170 B.C., when the first Roman official was honored.

37: two or three

38/9: at least one Roman = several (non nulli) Romans

P. 51, 16/7: extended to but never beyond communities = but never extended

to entire communities

29/30: .. the Cornelii, and Julii, the Junii, and the Memmii = ..

Cornelii, Julii, Junii and Memmii ….

P. 52, 21: .. all the ephebes bore = .. all the ephebes, as seen from a number

of inscriptions, bore …

31: anme = name

P. 53, 6: Epidarus = Epidaurus

7: civitas = Roman civitas

23: few traces = random traces

26: protect = project

NOTES , pp. 53-55

Nos.

9: Cf. also Florus, I, (xvii) 24, 1

10. Loeb translation

13. Loeb translation

19. For Plutarch, see also Ziegler, RE, XXI, col. 650, 6-9. For a recent study on the relations between the Greeks and Romans, see B. L. Forte, Greek Sentiment toward Rome and the Romans. A Study in Greco-Roman Relations. Diss. Bryn Mawr College, 1962. Available in microfilm.

20. That Corinth was not completely deserted after the destruction by Mummius, it is evinced from a number of coins found there and belonging to the period 146-44 B.C. (cf. J. M. Harris, Hesperia, X, 1941, p. 158; and H. S. Robinson, ibid., XXXI, 1962, p. 130 (THE COINS); see also F. J. de Waele, AJA, XXXV, 1931, pp. 410-411). Moreover, Junia Theodora, a ÑRvma€a residing at Corinth, is called katoikoËsa (cf. SEG, XVIII, 1962, p. 51 (n. 143), ll. 1/2, 22/23, 45, 47, 63, and 67=BCH, LXXXIII-1959, pp. 498-500), and this may possibly identify the Romans as ÑRvma›oi oﬂ katoikoËntew and signify that the Greek community antedated the founding of the colony.

24, 2: Mulonas = Mylonas

27. Speaking of the Italians

31, 5: … observed. = … observed at Dura (J. F. Gilliam, Historia, …)

6: .. in groups at Dura = .. in groups, may be increased if ….

The number of Aurelii, in groups of five and over, should be increased to 548 and the interval of their appearance changed to 7, 5, 5(5), 3(2), 5, 5 and 13 years respectively. The numbers within the parenthesis denote years of approximate, consecutive occurrence. Aurel[ii] are also mentioned in IG, II2, 1801, and are to be considered along with IG, II2, 1824 and 1825 (cf. A. E. Raubitschek, G°raw ÉAntvn€ou KeramopoÊllou, Athens, 1953, p. 250, note 3).

These Addenda-Corrigenda were attached, then, to the offprints.

NOTE. For Gaius Julius Nikanor (p. 51, 11-12), who hailed from Hierapolis in Syria, see Panathenais IV: Nikanor, Neos hOmeros (in this writer’s web site).

For the Aurelii at Athens (under note 31 above), see now this writer’s study published in the AncW, No. 28 below.

2. Klea and Leontis: Two Ladies from Delphi, BCH 90 (1966) 119-130.

3. ÉAnayhmatikØ ÉEpigrafØ §j ÉEleus›now (=A Dedicatory Inscription from Eleusis),

ÉArx. ÉEfhm. 1964(=1967) 120-123.

4. Tiberius Claudius Dioteimos Besaieus, Hesperia 36 (1967) 429-431.

5. Leonides VII of Melite and His Family, BCH 92 (1968) 493-518, with 4 stemmata.

T. Kl. Demostratos: Bernadette Puech, Orateurs et sophistes grecs dans les inscriptions d'époque impériale [Vrin, 2002] 205-208 (online preview).

6. Publius Aelius Sospis, Mnemosyne 22 (1968) 80-82.

7. Attic Inscriptions: Notes, ÉArx. ÉEfhm. 1968, 177-227. Plates 9-15.

8. Flavius Hierophantes Paianieus and Lucius Verus, REG 83 (1970) 63-69.

9. Herakleides' Archonship and Abaskantos' Paidotribia, Cl. Phil. 65 (1970) 96-98.

10. Some Observations on "Roman Athens," Historia 19 (1970) 561-564.

Page 562: yerÒfantiw = ﬂerÒfantiw.

Page 564 (stemma):

Damosyen€a Marayvn€a-Tib. Kl. NoÊiow §jO‡ou

([Fi]le›now) III

[Fi]le›now IV §j O‡ou

IG II²3994 = 7011 (Meritt’s IG II² copy)

11. Two Inscriptions from Upper Macedonia (Orestis), Epigraphica 33 (1971) 75-81.

12. A Phalerian Family and Its Relations - read by title at the Annual Meeting of The

American Philological Association (1970) and published in ÉArx. Delt€on 26. 1971(=1972) 276-316, Plate 76. No. 17 below.

13. The Family of Dexippos I Hermeios, ÉArx. ÉEfhm. 1972, 133-172, Plates 61-64.

P. 158, under No. 27a: the correct tribe is (ÑIppoyvnt€dow), not (Leont€dow).

Herennius Apollonios: Bernadette Puech, Orateurs et sophistes grecs dans les inscriptions d'époque impériale [Vrin, 2002] 98-99 (online preview).

Dexippos: Ibid., 217-219, 225 (online preview).

14. The Archon Q. Vibius Crispus Marathonius, AAA 6 (1973) 137-138.

15. Arrian's Praenomen Again, AAA 6 (1973) 301-304.

16. ÉEfhbikÚw Katãlogow ÉAnaxronologoÊmenow (=An Ephebic Text

Reconsidered), AAA 7 (1974) 96-98.

17. A Phalerian Family and Its Relations: Addenda et Corrigenda, ÉArx. Delt€on 27,

1972(=1974), 303-305. No. 12 above.

18. Apolexis ex Oiou, Athenaeum 52 (1974) 343-347.

19. Attic Inscriptions: Notes, Rbelge 52 (1974) 59-71.

20. Oﬂ ÖArxontew Gãiow ka‹ LoÊkiow (= The Archons Gaios and Loukios), AAA 7

(1974) 391-394.

21. The Archon Flavius Straton (VI) Paianieus, AJA 79 (1975) 369-371.

22. Klaudios Demostratos kai Aurelios Eukarpides, ÉArx. ÉEfhm. 1974(=1976) 3-4

(Xronikã).

23. Gaius Julius Nikanor, Neos Homeros kai Neos Themistokles, RFIC 104 (1976) 375-

377.

24. EPIGRAFAI EJ ELEUSINOS, ÉArx. ÉEfhm. 1975(=1977) 59-65, Plates 22-29.

25. Three Athenian Archons (et alia), ÑEllhnikå 29 (2), 1976(=1977) 248-266.

Les Cassiani de Steiria: Bernadette Puech, Orateurs et sophistes grecs dans les inscriptions d'époque impériale [Vrin, 2002] 509, 511 (online preview).

26. Phourios Markellos (I) Gargettios, ÉAyhnç 76 (1977) 182-186.

27. Paratereseis eis Attikas Epigraphas, ÉArx. Delt€on 30 (1975=1978) 120-139.

28. Some Remarks on the Athenian Prytaneis, AncW 4 (1981) 5-15, with Addendum to the

offprints:

AN ADDENDUM TO “SOME REMARKS ON THE ATHENIAN PRYTANEIS”

After the manuscript’s submittal for publication, the following relevant items were noticed:

(1) To the prytaneis appearing to have served in their early twenties (above) must be added (E)uphe(m)os son of As(klepiades Pal(eeneus)) of No. 380, line 9, of 169/70, who is attested as ephebe in IG II² 2094+2015, line 36, of about 166/7 (see S. Follet, p. 225). Euphemos would be the youngest attested prytanis, if the association is correct, as he would have been about twenty-one in 169/70. Moreover, it appears that Euphemos is mentioned again as prytanis in SEG XIX (1963), p. 69, No. 165, line 6: [E]Îfhmow ÉAs`[klhpiãdou], of about 169/70 now (for the dotted sigma, see Hesperia XXIX, 1960, Pl. 20, No. 111). His son is listed in line 7: [ÉAs]klhpiã[dhw EÈfÆmou], or perhaps his brother [ÉAs]klhpiã[dhw )]. The associations and restorations are this writer’s.

(2) Cn. Licinnius Attikos son of Licinnius Arrianos Gar(gettios) is attested as ephebe in IG II²3733 , lines 11-14, of 126/7, and undoubtedly he must be identified with one by the same name prytaneis of No. 371, lines 11 (likely) and 27, of 138/9 (Licinnius Attikos (Gargettios)). If an association can be made, then the ephebe Licinnius Attikos was serving as prytanis in his thirtieth year in 138/9. This would be additional evidence for the minimal age of thirty (above).

(3) Claudius Philetos Athmoneus who is attested as ephebe in IG II²2094+2015, lines 24 and 47, of about 166/7 (under No. 1 above) is apparently the prytanis Cl. Philetos (Athmoneus) of No. 402, line 49, which has been dated to 181/2. If this date is correct, then Cl. Philetos was serving as prytanis at about his thirty-third year. However, the date of No. 402 is not assured, and it may be that Cl. Philetos served in his thirtieth year or even earlier, in which case he may be another underage prytanis.

(4) The possibility of homonymy in Nos. 2 and 3 (above, under the ‘four” and “three time” prytaneis respectively) may be strengthened by the appearance of homonymous

ephebes at about 173 (see TALANTA VI, 1975, p. 25, lines 42-43).

(5) Of the fragmentary No. 463 (above) only 9 Aur(elii) were included in the percentage comparison. However, it may be possible to establish how many more Aur(elii) were inscribed through a percentage comparison of the 9 Aur(elii) against the 2 non-Aurelii (lines 5 and 11). Of the total 11 names (1 fragmentary is excluded), the non-Aurelii comprise 18%. When this percentage is multiplied by 40 (total number of prytaneis), the non-Aurelii come to 7.2. In other words, the Aur(elii) appear to have numbered 33. Since the surviving 11 names have already been included in the comparison (above), there remain the 24 Aur(elii) and 5 non-Aurelii. When these are added to the Aurelii and non-Aurelii after 212, the total is 130 (24+106) and 279 (5+274) respectively, with a percentage comparison of 31.785% (Aurelii) to 68.215% (non-Aurelii) of 409 names. The increase here in favor of the Aurelii is 3.885% (from the previous 27.9%). There is also No. 413 (above), but the number of Aur(elii) prytaneis, whose names have been lost, cannot be determined. However, the same analogy for No. 463 (above) may be applied here, too, and it would give us 33 Aur(elii) to 7 non-Aurelii. When these are added to the 130 Aurelii and 279 non-Aurelii (above), the percentage comes to 36.3% (163 Aurelii) and 63.7% (286 non-Aurelii) respectively (of a total of 449 names). Thus, as the evidence has been reinterpreted here, the Aurelii are not a majority among the prytaneis of 212 and after, and this minimizes the effect of the Constitutio Antoniniana. And it should be borne in mind that this high per- centage (36.3%) of Aurelii was reached with the inclusion of the collectively listed Aurelii of Nos. 470, 476 and 482 (above).

(6) For a previous brief comment on the repetition of the office of the prytanis, see Daniel J. Geagan, The Athenian Constitution after Sulla, Hesperia, Suppl. XII (1967), p. 75, with note 57.

ELIAS KAPETANOPOULOS

Corrigenda to published text:

P. 5 (1^st paragr.): Aurelli = Aurelii

(2^nd paragr.): alwasy = always

(3^rd paragr.): (Garettios) = (Gargettios)

(note 2): Hesperia XLVIII = Hesperia XLVII

P. 6 (line 3): 11, 168/9, = 11, of 168/9,

(line 6): Prytanis = prytanis

(line 12): line 35 of = line 35, of

(line 18): (Pr. = (Po.

(4^th paragr.): Marathonois = Marathonios

Note 9: 96-96 = 96-97

Note 11: Agora XV No. 405 = Agora XV, No. 405

P. 7 (top): identification, perhaps = identification, or perhaps

(2^nd paragr. from bottom): But be as it may = But be that as it may

: KM. = Kl.

(bottom): Hrodes = Herodes

P. 8 (2^nd paragr. top): “Three” = “three”

(under No. 1): Dik. = Lik.

(note 17): note 20 = note 2

(note 21): (41 with eponymos),, = (41 with the

eponymos),

P. 9 (under No. 1, line 2): (Pe[rilão]u) = (Pe`[rilão]u)

(under No. 3, line 2): line 37 of = line 37, of

(under No. 6, line 1): Hesperia XLVIII = Hesperia XLVII

(under No. 6a): “Three time” = “three time”

: restoratin = restoration

(under No. 7, line 1): writer, and = writer; and

P. 10 (under No. 8): delete [ÉAn] after 135/6

(under No. 9a): A. P. = A P.

(bottom): ahve = have

P. 11 (2^nd paragr.): frequency if = frequency is

: 6. Hadrianis (VIII) = 6. Hadrianis (VII)

(under NOTE): ÉEras[e›now] = ÉEras`[e›now]

: “two time = “two time”

: SEG XIII = SEG XII

: 2107 etc., (bis) = 2107 etc. (bis)

P. 12 (last paragr.): [AÈrÆl] = [AÈrÆl]ioi

Note 25: 72.105 = 72-105

Note 30: Epigraphical = Epigraphica

P. 13 (top): cataluge = catalogue

P. 14 (text, from bottom): Hesperia IV (1935 = Hesperia IV (1935)

(note 40): og IG II² 2245 = of IG II² 2245

P. 15

(top): availabe = available

(top): 13,000 = 13,200

(top): 73,763⁵ = 73,763⁵⁰

(note 47): ehre = here

(note 49): to 1527 = to the 1527

: percentage of = percentage to

: repitition = repetition

29. Hadrianis and the Boule of Five Hundred, Balkan Studies 22 (1981) 147-165.

Corrigenda:

P. 147 (1^st paragr.): affected = effected

P. 148, note 11: ﬂ°rei[an] = ﬂ°rei[an

P. 150: affected by 121/2 = effected by 121/2

P. 151 (2^nd paragr.): casual of = casual or

P. 153 (5^th line): But be as = But be that as

P. 154, under note 55: (1830) = (1930)

P. 155, note 63: Zapyros = Zopyros

P. 156, note 65 (1^st line): bbelow) = (below)

(2^nd line ad fin., correct reading): (Y[eodos€]/ou =

note 66: ZEP = ZPE

note 67: Delete all after eponymos

P. 157 ad med.: reserved = reversed

P. 161 ad med.: cocupied = occupied

P. 164 ad fin.: … as an iota. Add.: The photograph favors the iota reading.

SEG 53.1 (2003=2008) 8-9, No. 12. The Boule under Hadrian.

30. Attic Inscriptions: Agora XV, No. 420, Prometheus 8 (1982) 147-151.<