ALEXANDROS-PHILIPPOS-KLEITOS O MELAS
<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<><>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>
<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<><>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>
Elias Kapetanopoulos
Professor Dr. (Greece-Rome)
Department of History
Central Connecticut State University
New Britain, CT 06050-4010 (USA)
Telephone:
(860) 832-2820 (offic
(860) 229-9960 (home)
E-mail: Kapetanopoulos@ccsu.edu
Home Page: http://www.history.ccsu.edu/elias/elias.htm
Areas of Research: Attic epigraphy-Athenian institutions of the Roman period
(200 B.C.-3rd c. A.D.), and early Makedon(ia): Makedones as Hellenes.
==============================================================
CENTER FOR ATHENIAN-MAKEDONIAN STUDIES:
MAKEDONIS A' = MAKEDONIS I
ALEJANDROS – FILIPPOS - KLEITOS O MELAS
21 ÉIanouar€ou 1999 > 21
January 1999 = 9 ÉIoun€ou 2008 > 9
June 2008
The Greek font is
Athenian [+Unicode]. All rights reserved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADAIOU
ÉHmay€hn ˘w
pr«tow §w êrea b∞sa F€lippow
Afiga€hn ke›mai
b«lon §fessãmenow,
=°jaw oÂÉ oÎpv
basileÁw tÚ pr€n: efi d° tiw aÈxe›
me›zon §meË,
ka‹ toËyÉ a·matow ≤met°rou.
The Greek Anthology. The Garland of Philip and
Some Contemporary Epigrams, ed. A.S.F. Gow
and D.L. Page, I (Cambridge 1968) 6, IV.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOPIC: Façade fresco of a hunt
painted on the frieze of what has been identified (others reject) as Philip
II's tomb, discovered by Manolis Andronikos on the 11th of November
1977 under the great tumulus at Vergina (ancient Aigai[ai]).
Since the tomb has been identified as that of Philip II, the young hippeus (flppeÊw), center of fresco, has been recognized
as Alexander [M. Andronikos, N.G.L. Hammond], and indeed the young man must be
Alexander at about sixteen years old, and his central position in the façade
painting celebrates his entrance into adulthood and the assumption of the
regency at sixteen (Plutarch, Alex. 9.1:
Fil€ppou d¢ strateÊontow §p‹
Buzant€ouw, ∑n m¢n •kkaidekãthw ı ÉAl°jandrow, époleifye‹w d¢ kÊriow §n
Makedon€& t«n pragmãtvn ka‹ t∞w sfrag›dow, ktl. [one may ask why
depict this particular event in Alexander's life, but this event is the most
intimate one vis-à-vis his father Philip and Alexander's "rush" at
the lion speared by Philip symbolizes his [Alexander’s] initiation into basileÊein]). To his right [left from
viewer's perspective] there is a tall, square pillar with three miniature
figures (?) at the top, which must be a country shrine, dedicated to some deity
[Hekate? However, because of the scene, Artemis would be more appropriate]. A
pillar with an amphora at the top appears, for example, in the Polydeukion
relief [A.D. 173/4] from Loukou (Thyreatis Kynourias), as well as the tree
motif next to the young man, but the tree shows life [below] (ALKMHNH NTATSOULH-STAURIDH, GLUPTA APO THN
YUREATIDA KUNOURIAS [AYHNA 1993] P€n. 40, with description on p. 51).
To the right (left) of this young hippeus an older hippeus is depicted about
to spear a lion [which differs in appearance from the usual African lions].
This older hippeus, who has been identified as king Philip II [N.G.L. Hammond],
is not shown in a heroic manner as the rest of the men therein, but displays a
shorter stature which would accord with the reconstructed skeleton recovered
from the tomb [taking also into account pyre shrinkage of bones]. Philip's
skeleton was viewed on the 22-9-92, and perhaps the split damage, [sxismØ] maurism°nh s¢ m°rh, on the upper
right eye-socket may perhaps be "pyre inflicted", but with the strong
caveat that the eye involved is the same as Philip's injured eye and the injury
is also indicated on the same eye in the ivory portrait of Philip recovered
from his tomb at Vergina. As to the woman in the same tomb [below], it is
probably Phila who would have been older than Kleopatra and Eurydike, as
indicated by the bones [cf. the silver (wine) strainer found in the tomb, which
belonged to Machatas (inscribed MAXATA)
who was Phila's brother (Manolis Andronikos, Berg€na,
ofl basiliko‹ tãfoi ka‹ êllew érxaiÒthtew [AyÆna 1984=1989] 148, Fig. 108, and 156-157; in Petros
G. Themelis/Ioannes P. Touratsoglou, OI
TAFOI TOU DERBENIOU (AYHNA !997) 172-173, Machatas is identified as the maker of the silver strainer: ΜΑΧΑΤΑ DDDD8)]. [A
letter of this writer about the tomb at Vergina, as recalled, was published,
but not seen, in the TO BHMA [1979], and Manolis Andronikos discussed it with a
sunomÆlikow of this writer (as
informed by the sunomÆlikow, summer
1991), but the letter's contents are not recoverable at this time, since the
copy of the letter had been discarded then on the assumption it had not been
published, and TO BHMA cannot trace
it without a definite date] ***<<similar circumstances to the letter to H KAYHMERINH, which apparently the paper
did not publish>>***).
The fresco's background shows a range of hills [Pierian-Bermian
mountains-hills?], but the action takes place on a level ground, with scattered
boulder-stones on the right. The trees are probably oaks (drËw) [and not birch (Ùju°w), for example] , and this is perhaps
also true for the grove of trees behind the lion scene [the grove is thick, and
consequently the trees have tall, bare trunks with foliage at the top]. The
"dead" tree next to young Alexander [his left side] resembles in a
way the tree [by the left side of Alexander] in the Alexander Mosaic [which E.
Badian below would call the Darius Mosaic. It is true that Dareios' figure
stands tall, but Dareios appears to be in a state of anxiety, whereas Alexander
with a fixed look eyes the enemy, as he spears through a Persian with his long
sarissa. For Alexander's pose, cf., e.g., The Archaeology of Athens and
Attica under the Democracy, eds. W.D.E.
Coulson, O. Palagia, T.L. Shear, Jr., H.A. Shapiro and F.J. Frost (Oxbow
Monograph 37, 1994) 132, Fig. 2. Bl°pontew
mØ bl°pein, Polybios 12.24.6: bl°pontaw
mØ bl°pein, and Luke’s gospel,
8.10: ·na bl°pontew mØ bl°pvsin ka‹
ékoÊontew mØ sun€vsin. Cf. Plutarch, Isis and Osiris, 381 B: Àste
bl°pein mØ blepÒmenon (crocodile)].
This motif of 'Alexander-"dead"tree' appears also in a close parallel
in the lion hunt mosaic from Palermo (Cohen, below, 77, Fig. 48), for the young
rider by the dead tree about to spear the lion has been identified as Alexander
(Cohen, below, 76). The "dead" tree by Alexander is an artistic motif
of identification, and one may recall Alexander's oak tree at Chaironeia
mentioned by Plutarch in Alexander 9.2: ¶ti d¢ ka‹ kay' ≤mçw §de€knuto palaiå parå tÚn
KhfisÚn ÉAlejãndrou kaloum°nh drËw, prÚw ¥n tÒte kateskÆnvse, ka‹ tÚ
poluãndrion oÈ pÒrrv t«n MakedÒnvn §st€n. Moreover, the "dead"
tree projects Alexander's image more than a living tree with foliage would have
done, and at the same time the Persian concentration magnifies Alexander's odds
of victory. As for Alexander being depicted there bare-headed, cf. Nikolaos of
Myra in Andrew Erskine, “Life after Death: Alexandria and the Body of
Alexander, Greece&Rome 49.2 (October
2002) 176: <<… He (=Alexander) built his city (=Alexandria) near the sea,
which he himself stands near. And
the form of the statue reveals his nature. First, he is carried riding high on
a horse; not a horse that anyone could easily ride, but one suitable to the dangers
that he faced. And the animal’s
vehemence evokes the speed of his campaigns. Next, he has no helmet on his head. For he who intends to subdue and survey
the whole earth has no need of helmets.
Everything he has seized in his advance seems to lie in his eyes. … His hair, unconfined, streams in the
wind and onward rush of the horse.
Its locks appear like the
rays of the sun. …>>. [Note
54: Ps. Libanius, Progymnasmata
27, etc.] [For the helmet in the mosaic, almost direcly below Alexander’s right
arm, which some would identify as Alexander’s, cf. Homer, Iliad 16.791-803: st∞
dÉ ˆpiyen [=ÉApÒllvn], pl∞jen d¢
metãfrenon eÈr°e tÉ \mv/ xeir‹ kataprhne›, strefed€nhyen d¢ ofl ˆsse [=PatrÒklou]./ toË dÉ épÚ m¢n kratÚw kun°hn bãle
Fo›bow ÉApÒllvn:/ ≤ d¢ kulindom°nh kanaxØn ¶xe poss‹n ÍfÉ ·ppvn/ aÈl«piw
trufãleia, miãnyhsan d¢ ¶yeirai/ a·mati ka‹ kon€˙si. pãrow ge m¢n oÈ y°miw ∑en/
flppÒkomon pÆlhka mia€nesyai kon€˙sin,/ éllÉ éndrÚw ye€oio kãrh xar€en te
m°tvpon/ =ÊetÉ ÉAxill∞ow: tÒte d¢ ZeÁw ÜEktori d«ken/ √ kefalª for°ein,
sxedÒyen d° ofl ∑en ˆleyrow./ pçn d° ofl §n xe€ressin êgh dolixÒskion ¶gxow,/
briyÁ m°ga stibarÚn kekoruym°non: aÈtår épÉ \mvn/ ésp‹w sÁn telam«ni xama‹ p°se
termiÒessa. A broken spear and other arms are also shown scattered at
the feet of the horses.] Cf. also Q. Curtius Rufus, 8.1.20. Hic [=Clitus] erat
qui apud Granicum amnem nudo capite regem dimicantem clipeo suo texit et
Rhosacis manum capiti regis imminentem gladio amputavit, ... (Note: nudo
capite)

The battle scene must be Arbela or Gaugamela (as also indicated elsewhere)
[but cf. Curtius, 3.11.7-12], and the helmet can be seen below Alexander’s
right arm.
The top€on of the fresco hunting
scene is surely Makedonian [hills, oak trees], and the hunted animals, too, are
part of the Makedonian experience. The wild boar is still being hunted in the
mountains of Orestis [Pindos-Boion-Grammos], for example; the bear [right end]
is still there, and it can be encountered in Orestis, area of Pentalophos
(locations of Nikorinna, Taliaros [ancient Talares? (Strabon 9.5.11 and 12
C434)]). The deer (§lãfia) also [two
shown on the far left] were hunted in Orestis (with zarkãdia), and they almost disappeared but lately there is a
come back (although some illegal hunting occurs). As for the lion shown therein,
N. G. L. Hammond correctly referred to Herodotos [below] and Xenophon [below]
for lions in Makedon [herein in this web site, under Makedonis VIII: Philippos,
Meros A, under Hammond: ABSA 86 (1991) 80]; cf. also Pausanias, Boiotika 40.8: §pelyÒnta
d° fasin (=MakedÒnew) §k toË ÉOlÊmpou
l°onta énatr°cai, ktl., and below under KremÊdh-SisilianoË. Moreover, the motif of hunting lions
appears among the Mycenaeans, and the lion figures as a theme in similes of
Homer’s Iliad. Bronze coin of
Kassandros: Obv.: Herakles head with lion-skin, Rev.: seated lion, Inscr.: KASSAN/DROU (dotted K) = Greek Civilization. Macedonia, Kingdom of Alexander
the Great (Athens 1993) 99, No. 39 (of an
exhibition in Montreal, 7/5th-19/9th 1993). [Perdikkas
III’s coin with lion on the reverse]
The participants in this hunting scene are Makedones, and the melagxroinÒw [extreme right] must be
Kleitos the Black [Kle›tow ı m°law],
who was older than Alexander. [Kleitos] holding a net [by its position] appears
to be fishing, although the net's holes are somewhat large for fishing, but
this may not be significant since [Kleitos] looks at the net and water may be
discerned therein (cf. AEMY 8, 1994
[Thessalonike 1998] 120-121, 122). Moreover, [Kleitos'] isolation there and
somewhat melancholic, downward look, though staring at the net, may foreshadow
his death. In any case, the Makedonian rivers [at least of Orestis, although
enviromental reasons and overfishing have altered the scene] were full of fish
and of delicious fish, which overjoyed the Makedones when fish were brought to
them from home [Athenaios? xxxxx; the actual reference to fish from home
escapes identification presently, but reading it is recalled with vividness].
The inspiration of this fresco is atrributed by some to eastern influence,
and therefore the tomb is not Philip II's, but Philippos Arridaios' [herein in
this web site, under Makedonis VIII: Philippos, Meros A,, under Xarã Kioss°, for example]. However, the
scene as briefly commented above is purely Makedonian, and the terrain bears no
resemblance to an eastern environment of about Babylon (and this is true of the
hunted animals, too). Naturally the tomb attributed to Philip raises questions
(as to who is the young woman in the antechamber, for example), but the tomb's
theme is that of Philip II [cf. also below, under Kottar€dh <<nekrikÚw o‰kow ka‹ purå Fil€ppou>>].
It is known from Diodoros (17.2.1: … ÉAl°jandrow
diadejãmenow tØn basile€an pr«ton m¢n toÁw fone›w toË patrÚw t∞w èrmozoÊshw
timvr€aw ±j€vse, metå d¢ taËta t∞w taf∞w toË gon°vw tØn §ndexom°nhn §pim°leian
poihsãmenow kat°sthse tå katå tØn érxÆn …) and from the Alexander
Romance (Kapetanopoulos, below, 87) that
Alexander gave Philip a formal burial, and consequently it may not be looked
upon as unusual if the painter made a young Alexander the center in the
fresco's hunting scene. It is said that Tomb II was hastily put together, and
for this reason Alexander, as reported in the Ípomnhmata, had in mind of constructing a monumental tomb of
Philip equal to one of the pyramids in Egypt [Diodoros, 18.4.5: toË d¢ patrÚw Fil€ppou tãfon puram€di paraplÆsion
miò tª meg€st˙ (t«n) katå tØn A‡gupton].
And certainly the suns (¥lioi) on
the larnakes of the deceased are a symbol of royalty [below] and Makedon in
general [evidence has been collected on the Bergina (Vergina) ¥liow, but presently there is no intention
of posting it here, for example; this evidence derives from Makedon and
elsewhere and it is pictographic (below)].
NOTE. Some would attribute Tomb II to Philippos Arridaios-Adea Eurydike and
identify the hunter with a purple cloak to the left of the lion [viewer’s side]
as Kassandros; but if the hunting scene on the façade is Kassandros’, or from
Kassandros’ time, why is Alexander to the left shown at about sixteen? Perhaps
the figure that some would identify as Kassandros is really Amyntas, Perdikkas’
son and Philip II’s son-in-law, eliminated later by Alexander. Moreover, if
Tomb II is Philippos Arridaios’-Eurydike’s, as some maintain, then where is
Philip II’s tomb, as Manolis Andronikos queried? Or did Kassandros appropriate Philip’s tomb to bury [¶yacen, yãcaw,
under Carney, AncW 35.2 (2004) below]
Philippos Arridaios and Eurydike? But again where is Kynna?

Theatron. Two photographs side by side superimposed below.

Theatron at Aigai (Vergina) [two superimposed photographs (above), scanned
by this writer who took them on the 4th of Oct. 2001], where Philip
II was assassinated by Pausanias in the summer of 336 B.C.

The tomb of Philip II (Bergina).

Façade [left side].

Façade [right side].

Philip II from the hunting scene of the façade above [from TO BHMA]. The fact that the right eye, which was Philip II’s damaged
eye, is hidden from the viewer is
a sure indication that the figure is Philip II.

Alexander from the façade above [from TO
BHMA] and to the left of Philip II. Below, Alexander. Sidon sarcophagus.

Alexander. The façade [above].

Alexander. Sidon sarcophagus.
[scanned by Dave Gartner, Graduate Assistant, from Margaret Bieber, Alexander
the Great in Greek and Roman Art (Argonaut,
Chicago 1964) Pl. XVIII, 34 a-b].
These two faces of Alexander bear a resemblance to the face of Alexander
in the façade of Philip II’s tomb above, a further indication that the young
man in the façade is Alexander and that the tomb is that of Philip II, as
previously identified [though contested by some].
=======================================
HLIOS [above]

Philip II’s larnax [from his tomb at Vergina].

Phila’s larnax? [Philip II’s tomb at Vergina]. Photograph from Elizabeth Carney’s home page.

Kinch tomb.

Lyson-Kallikles tomb.

Aspis – Shield.
==============================
BIBLIOGRAFIA > REFERENCES:
TO BHMA, N°ew Epox°w, 12-07-98, b1: Illustration of Philip II on horse.
TO BHMA, ibid., b6-7:
Illustration of hunting scene on façade of Philip II's tomb, and young
Alexander on horse.
TO BHMA, N°ew Epox°w, 26-07-98, b8: Illustration of young Alexander on
horse.
----------
Bibliography, additional, herein
in this web site, under Makedonis VIII: Philippos, Meros A.
-----------
Badian, Ernst, 'A Note on the "Alexander Mosaic"' in The Eye
Expanded: Life and the Arts in Greco-Roman Antiquity, edd. Frances B. Titchener and Richard F. Moorton, Jr. (UofC
Press; Berkeley, 1999) 86-88.
Barringer, Judith M., The Hunt in Ancient Greece (The Johns Hopkins University Press; Baltimore
2001); cf. reconstruction of Kalydonian hunt (152) and 201-202.
Bartsiokas, Antonis, The Eye Injury of King Philip II and the Skeletal Evidence
from the Royal Tomb II at Vergina, Science
magazine, 21 April 2000; 288: 511-514.
Borza, Eugene N., Before Alexander: Constructing Early Macedonia (Publications of the AAH 6 [Regina Books] 1999)
68-74.
Briant, P., <<Chasses royales macedoniennes et chasses royales perses.
Le theme de la chasse au lion sur la chasse de Vergina>>, Dialogues
d'histoire ancienne 17.1 (1991) 227-243
[non vidi]=Anc.
Macedonia VI (1996='99), vol. A, 648, note
24.
Carney, Elizabeth D., Women and Monarchy in Macedonia (UofOklahomaPress 2000) 234-244 (ch. 9: Royal Female
Burials).
Carney, Elizabeth D., "Were the Tombs under the Great Tumulus at
Vergina Royal?," ArchNews
[forthcoming].
Carney, Elizabeth, <<Women and Military Leadership in Macedonia>>,
AncW 35.2 (2004) 187: Leans toward Adea
Eurydice as the woman in Tomb II=Philip’s tomb. [Errata, notes 17
and 18: Drougou=Drogou]
The comments below may be refined accordingly: 1
May 2005
Adea-Eurydike, wife of Arrhidaios Philippos, it is
said, is the female in what has been identified as Philip II’s tomb, because of
the military paraphernalia found in the chamber and Adea-Eurydike has been
recognized as a warrior woman/queen. However, when Olympias suggested to
Adea-Eurydike to choose one of three ways to die [sword, noose, or poison] she
chose the noose, a kind of a humiliating way of dying [cf. Jocasta, Oedipus’
mother, and Odysseus punishing the unfaithful women by hanging (Odyssey, 22.462-473)]. The épor€a/§r≈thsiw: Why didn’t Adea-Eurydike choose to die a
heroic death by the sword, if she were so war-like as maintained?. Cf. Diodoros, 19.11. (5) …, tÚn m¢n F€lippon pros°taje [=ÉOlumpiåw] Yr&j€ tisin §kkent∞sai, … (6) efis°pemcen oÔn aÈt∞ [=EÈrud€k˙] j€fow ka‹ brÒxon ka‹ k≈neion … (7) … tÚn
m¢n êndra peri°steilen, §pimelhye›sa t«n traumãtvn Àw poyÉ ı kairÚw sunex≈rei,
§autØn dÉ énakremãsasa tª z≈n˙ kat°strece tÚn b€on, oÎte dakrÊsasa tØn aÍt∞w
tÊxhn oÎte t“ meg°yei t«n sumptomãtvn tapeinvye›sa [this last does show
fortitude on the part of Adea-Eurydike]. Cf.
Douris=Athenaios, 13.560 f: DoËriw dÉ ı
Sãmiow ka‹ pr«ton gen°syai pÒlemÒn fhsi dÊo gunaik«n (tÚn) ÉOlumpiãdow ka‹
EÈrud€khw: §n ⁄ tØn m¢n bakxik≈teron metå tumpãnvn proelye›n, tØn dÉ EÈrud€khn
Makedonik«w kayvplism°nhn, éskhye›san [=…plism°nhn,
prohskhm°nhn C]
tå polemikå parå KÊnn˙ [=kunnãnhi A] tª ÉIllur€di (Loeb); however, cf. Diodoros, 19.11.1-2 [where Polyperchon figures
in that <<clash>> with Eurydike at Euia below Bermion=Kastania].
The other
épor€a/§r≈thsiw: whether Adea-Eurydike, Philippos Arrhidaios and Kynna
were cremated, for Diodoros and Diyllos=Athenaios imply only burial, with
funeral games [in the style of Achilles after Patroklos’ funeral?]. Diodoros, 19.52. (4) ı d¢ Kãsandrow diegn≈kei m¢n énele›n ÉAl°jandron
tÚn pa›da ka‹ tØn mht°ra aÈtoË ÑRvjãnhn, …
(5) metå d¢ taËta basilik«w ≥dh diejãgvn tå katå tØn érxØn EÈrud€khn m¢n ka‹
F€lippon toÁw basile›w, ¶ti d¢ KÊnnan, ∂n éne›len ÉAlk°taw, ¶yacen §n Afigaia›w,
kayãper ¶yow ∑n to›w basileËsi. timÆsaw d¢ toÁw teteleuthkÒtaw §pitaf€oiw ég«si
kat°grafe t«n MakedÒnvn toÁw eÈy°touw,
…; and Diyllos=Athenaios, 4.155 a: ˜ti
d¢ ka‹ ofl ¶ndojoi ka‹ ofl ≤gemÒnew §monomãxoun ka‹ §k proklÆsevw toËtÉ §po€oun
§n êlloiw efirÆkamen. D€ullow [=diÊalow
A] dÉ ı ÉAyhna›ow §n tª §nãt˙
t«n flstori«n f∞sin …w Kãsandrow §k Boivt€aw §pani∆n ka‹ yãcaw tÚn basil°a ka‹
tØn bas€lissan §n Afiga€aiw ka‹ metÉ aÈt«n tØn KÊnnan tØn EÈrud€khw mht°ra ka‹
to›w êlloiw timÆsaw oÂw prosÆkei ka‹ monomax€aw ég«na [=ég«naw A] ¶yhken, efiw ˘n kat°bhsan t°ssarew t«n strativt«n.
Antonis
Bartsiokas (ÉAnt≈nhw Mpartsi≈kaw) stated in Science 288 (21 April 2000) 514 [511-514] that
the bones of the male occupant were more or less dry, because Philippos
Arrhidaios had been buried for about six months. The épor€a/§r≈thsiw: Why would Kasandros cremate bare bones, and
not just bury the bones? [unless to give the impression of a heroic/royal
burial]. And would the skeletons be devoid of almost all flesh after only six
months in the earth? However, it is not known how Olympias disposed of
Philippos Arrhidaios’ and Eurydike’s bodies, and if she had buried them at all
[Diodoros’ ¶yacen and Douris’ [=Athenaios] yãcaw (above)
suggest a first burial, with no indication of a reburial and its dramatics,
although having also Kynna’s body/or sorÚw would indicate some kind of a retention
of bodies. The épor€a/§r≈thsiw: Where is Kynna? The two sources mentioned herein give
the impression that the three were buried together, and this would have been
most fitting since Kynna was the mother [=basilomÆtvr] of the queen/bas€lissa
Adea-Eurydike.
It has
also been argued that the paraphernalia, or some of the paraphernalia, in Tomb
II belong/may belong to Alexander; therefore, Tomb II is not Philip’s. The épor€a/§r≈thsiw: Could these paraphernalia, if Alexander’s, have been placed
there afterwards? Perhaps Philip’s tomb may have been opened to veneration
[that is, it was not immediately sealed, but only later, after the death of
Alexander and whose body went to Egypt instead of to Aigai] (cf. Diodoros,
19.22.1: ÑVw d° poyÉ ∏kon efiw
Pers°polin tÚ bas€leion, Peuk°sthw m°n, Ãn taÊthw t∞w x≈raw strathgÒw, yus€an
§pet°lese megaloprep∞ to›w yeo›w ka‹ ÉAlejãndrƒ ka‹ Fil€ppƒ, ktl., and
3: §n m°sƒ d¢ toÊtvn Íp∞rxon bvmo‹ ye«n ka‹
ÉAlejãndrou ka‹ Fil€ppou [317 B.C.]). These épor€ai/§rvtÆseiw
can perhaps be answered with greater accuracy by those who observed the objects
in their original position, before their disturbance. There are, of course,
photographs, but the photographs cannot really convey/recreate the original
[for example, the nature of the sites of Dion. Dodona or Delphi cannot be
captured through photographs or even through videos, for only an actual visit
there explains why they were chosen to be sacred places: Olympos over Dion,
mountainous Dodona, Delphi].
Lastly,
the injuries that Philip II is said to have received may not have been as
injurious or extensive as reported [for example, the destruction of his eye may
not have involved the bone at all, and this may apply to the injuries in his
legs, as well]. Philippos Arrhidaios, too, may have borne bone injuries, if
speared, as it may be inferred from Diodoros, 19.11.5: tÚn m¢n F€lippon pros°taje [=ÉOlumpiåw] Yr&j€
tisin §kkent∞sai.
Carney, Elizabeth,
<<Hunting and the Macedonian elite: sharing the rivalry of the chase
(Arrian 4.13.1)>> in The Hellenistic World: New Perspectives, ed. Daniel Ogden [The Classical Press
of Wales and Duckworth, 2002] 59-68
(text),
69-74 (Notes), 74-80 (Bibliography).
Page
61, with notes 32-36. The lion in Macedonia. Also cited below, under LEONTES.
Pages
66-67, with notes 75-87. Tomb II as a <<late fourth century>>
construction. [1 Nov. 2006]
Cohen, Ada, The Alexander Mosaic. Stories of Victory and Defeat (Cambridge, 1997) 53-57, 73-78.
Diodoros, 18.4.5: toË d¢ patrÚw Fil€ppou
tãfon puram€di paraplÆsion miò tª meg€st˙ {t«n} katå tØn A‡gupton, ìw §n to›w
•ptã tinew meg€stoiw ¶rgoiw katariymoËsin. (6) énagnvsy°ntvn d¢ t«n Ípomnhmãtvn
ofl
MakedÒnew,
ka€per épodedegm°noi kal«w tÚn ÉAl°jandron, ˜mvw ÍperÒgkouw ka‹ dusef€ktouw tåw
§pibolåw ır«ntew ¶krinan mhd¢n t«n efirhm°nvn suntele›n [Alexander’s ÍpomnÆmata].
DroÊgou. St°lla, Berg€na. Tå PÆlina
ÉAgge›a t∞w Megãlhw ToÊmpaw [ÉArxaiologikØ ÑEtaire€a, ÉAy∞nai, 2005].
Reviewed by Susan I. Rotroff in AJA 111 (2007) 809-810.
ELEUYEROTUPIA,
Tetãrth, 08-02-2006, T°xnew [Online]:
<<S€goura o tãfow toË Fil€ppou>> / YESSALONIKH / Tou SAKH APOSTOLAKH.
EYNOSONLINE,
E-LIFE >> EPISTHMES, 30/4/2008,
<<Oi tãfoi e€nai basiliko€>>...,
AggelikÆ K≈tth [>E.N. Borza, www.nationalgeographic.com, arguing for Philip III in Tomb II]. See 2008 AIA Annual Meeting, Chicago,
below.
H
OLGA PALAGGIA éntapantç/replies. EYNOSONLINE,
E-LIFE >> TEXNES - POLITISMOS,
7/5/2008: “Mia apãnthsh sthn <<Ep€yesh
ston tãfo tou Fil€ppou>>” [§pistolØ/letter ÖOlgaw Palaggiç].
Below, under 2008 AIA Annual Meeting, Chicago. Palaggia replies to
ETHNOS’ dhmos€euma <<Ep€yesh>> ston tãfo tou Fil€ppou / To Nãsional
Tzeogkrãfik amfisbhte› ton AndrÒniko me skopianÆ... ompr°la, AGGELIKH KVTTH
[<<E>> 29/4].
Philip’s assassination/cremation/[burial]: AncW
27.1 (1996) 84 (text), 87 (translation) [81-87]=P. Oxy. XV 1798, fr. 1=FGrH 148 F 1 [below, Kapetanopoulos, Elias, <<Philip
II’s Assassination and Funeral>>]. This accords with the cremated remains
in Tomb II.
Alexander’s ˜pla/insignia, see N.G.L.
Hammond, <<ARMS AND THE KING: THE INSIGNIA OF ALEXANDER THE
GREAT>>, Phoenix 43 (1989)
217-224=Collected Studies III
(Adolf M. Hakkert, Amsterdam, 1994) 183-190.
Quintus Curtius,
10.6.4: Tunc Perdicca, regia sella in conspectum volgi data, in qua diadema
vestisque Alexandri cum armis erant, anulum sibi pridie traditum a rege in
eadem sede posuit; idem, 10.10.13:
deinde precati, ut ius fasque esset mortalibus attrectare deum [=eum], purgavere corpus, repletumque est odoribus aureum
solium et capiti adiecta fortunae eius insignia (Aegyptii, Chaldaei); idem, 10.6.15: “Mea sententia haec est, ut sede Alexandri
in regia posita, qui consiliis eius adhibebantur, coeant quotiens in commune
consulto opus fuerit, eoque quod maior pars eorum decreverit stetur, duces
praefectique copiarum his pareant” (Ptolemy speaking).
Diodoros, 18.26.4: §pãnv d¢ t∞w yÆkhw §pet°yeito [Dindorf, §pet€yeto] kaluptØr xrusoËw, èrmÒzvn ékrib«w ka‹
perilambãnvn tØn énvtãtv perif°reian. taÊthw dÉ §pãnv peri°keito foinik‹w
diaprepØw xrusopo€kiltow, parÉ ∂n ¶yesan tå toË methllaxÒtow ˜pla, boulÒmenoi
sunoikeioËn tØn ˜lhn fantas€an ta›w prokateirgasm°naiw prãjesi [Alexander’s èrmãmaja].
Diodoros,
18.60.3-61.1-2 (skhnÆ,
yrÒnow) [Nepos, Eumenes, 7.1-3, Polyainos, 4.8.2]. Plutarch, Eumenes13,
(3) ÖEfh går
ÉAl°jandron aÈt“ [=EÈm°nei] katå toÁw Ïpnouw
fan∞nai, ka‹ de›ja€ tina skhnØn kateskeuasm°nhn basilik«w ka‹ yrÒnon §n aÈtª
ke€menon: e‰ta efipe›n …w §ntaËya sunedreÊousin aÈto›w ka‹ xrhmat€zousin aÈtÚw
par°stai ka‹ sunefãcetai boul∞w te pãshw ka‹ prãjevw érxom°nouw épÉ aÈtoË.
taËta =ad€vw ¶peise tÚn ÉAntig°nh ka‹ tÚn TeÊtamon, oÎte §ke€nvn bad€zein
boulom°nvn prÚw aÈtÒn, oÎte aÈtÚw éji«n §p‹ yÊraiw •t°rvn ırçsyai. (4) ka‹
tiy°ntew oÏtv skhnØn basilikØn ka‹ yrÒnon ÉAlejãndrƒ katapefhmism°non §ke›
suneporeÊonto bouleuÒmenoi per‹ t«n meg€stvn.
Aelian, Varia
Historia 12.64. Alexander’s body and
Ptolemy’s ımo€vma/ruse against Perdikkas.
Suetonius, Gaius, 52: ...
Triumphalem quidem ornatum etiam ante expeditionem assidue gestavit [=Gaius],
interdum et Magni Alexandri thoracem repetitum e conditorio eius [cf. idem, Divus Augustus, 18.1]. Cassius Dio, 59.17.3: §peidÆ te ßtoima ∑n, tÒn te y≈raka tÚn ÉAlejãndrou, Àw ge
¶lege [=Gãiow], ka‹ §pÉ aÈt“ xlamÊda shrikØn èlourg∞, polÁ
m¢n xrus€on polloÁw d¢ ka‹ l€youw ÉIndikoÁw ¶xousan, §pen°du, j€fow te
parez≈sato ka‹ ésp€da ¶labe ka‹ dru˛ §stefan≈sato, (4) ...
ELEUYEROTUPIA, ParaskeuÆ, 1/6/2001,
TEXNES [Online]: O tãfow tou
Megal°jandrou [F. Mp.]
Presentation of the 2nd improved edition
of <<O IIow basilikÒw tãfow thw
Berg€naw apokalÊptei ton M°ga Al°jandro>> (ekd.
<<Yessalon€kh>>) by
Triantãfullow D. Papaz≈hw, [dutiko] MakedÒnaw, pr≈hn strativtikÚw ka‹ melethtØw
t∞w Berg€naw katå tØn 10et€an toË É90. Previously published in 1993
under the title <<Ston F€lippo BÉ Æ
ston M°ga Al°jandro anÆkei o basilikÒw tãfow thw Berg€naw;>>.
Thesis, as reported by F. Mp.: Tomb II does not belong to Philip II, but to Arridaios
Philippos [this writer: as some others maintain, but there are serious
obstacles to this view]. Philip II
was buried in Tomb III. Later Antigonos Gonatas modified Tomb II and Alexander
and Roxane were reburied there, as was Alexander IV, Alexander’s and Roxane’s
son, in Tomb III.
Gordiod°smata.
Repeated herein, under Makedonis VI: Alexandros:
Bibliographia.
ELEUYEROTUPIA, KuriakÆ, 17-04-2005 [Online]: AMFISBHTHSH APÉ TA KOKALA BGALMENH / Oi sÊgxronoi <<Makedonomãxoi>> [Ke€meno